![]() Splunk is then used to drill down into the part of the identified infrastructure to determine the exact nature of the problem (for example a security breach). The most common use case for using them together is that Dynatrace finds the problem, determines if it is the code or not and if not determines where in the software and hardware infrastructure the problem resides. In fact, Dynatrace has integration with Splunk, and Splunk has a Splunk App for Dynatrace up in Splunkbase. Rather than viewing these things as competitors, many companies use them together. The principal competitors to Dynatrace are AppDynamics, New Relic, and Instana. There is no similar capability in Splunk. The key to Dynatrace's ability to do this is its real-time topology and dependency mapping engine called SmartScape. The primary competitors to Splunk are Elastic and Sumologic.ĭynatrace is an Application Performance Management solution designed to automatically measure the performance of an application (or a micro-service), discover the topology and dependencies that the application relies upon, and determine if a problem is in the code or in the software and hardware infrastructure that supports the application. That problem can span the entire gamut from security, to infrastructure operations to application operations. Its purpose is after the fact forensics (what happened) as a part of a problem resolution process. Splunk is primarily a log collection, analysis, and visualization solution. While some users have observed a substantial ROI, others have not actively explored or been engaged in ROI conversations.Īnswer: The two things are entirely different. ROI: Dynatrace users said the solutions saved them money and reduced downtime. Users said that it’s challenging to calculate an ROI for Splunk Enterprise Security, and the return varies depending on individual circumstances. ![]() A few users expressed concerns about the cost of scaling up the solution and managing large volumes of data. Some said they struggled to accurately predict the number of units needed. Some users consider Splunk Enterprise Security to be expensive, but others said the price is reasonable. Some noted that the licensing model is complicated and not transparent. Pricing: Users say Dynatrace is expensive. It takes a few hours at most. Some users thought Splunk Enterprise Security was easy to deploy, while others found it challenging and needed assistance from Splunk engineers or third-party integrators. Service and Support: Users generally found Dynatrace's customer service to be satisfactory, but some said that the response times and documentation have room for improvement. While some users found Splunk support to be responsive and helpful, others reported slow response times and a lack of expertise.Įase of Deployment: Dynatrace's setup is simple, efficient, and requires minimal technical configuration. Splunk users recommended improvements in AI capabilities, user-friendliness, and analytics. Users say that Dynatrace should offer more security options and improve integration with other tools. Room for Improvement: Some Dynatrace reviewers feel the learning curve is a little steep, and the documentation could be clearer. It also offers session replay and impressive visualization features. Splunk Enterprise Security stands out for its efficiency, extensive integration options, and powerful search functionality. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:įeatures: Dynatrace is highly regarded for its advanced AI engine and ability to identify infrastructure automatically. ![]() We compared Dynatrace and Splunk Enterprise Security across several parameters based on our users' reviews.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |